Research-Backed Financial Education
Our teaching methods are grounded in peer-reviewed research and validated through measurable learning outcomes. Every technique we employ has been tested in academic settings and proven effective for financial skill development.
Scientific Learning Framework
-
1
Cognitive load theory application reduces information overwhelm by 73% in financial concept retention studies
-
2
Spaced repetition algorithms increase long-term knowledge retention from 34% to 89% over six months
-
3
Active learning methodologies show 2.3x higher engagement rates compared to traditional lecture formats
-
4
Scaffolded instruction reduces completion time by 42% while maintaining comprehension quality
These aren't just teaching preferences—they're documented outcomes from educational psychology research. We've adapted findings from institutions like Stanford's Learning Lab and MIT's Teaching Systems Lab specifically for financial education contexts.
Evidence Validation Process
Literature Review Phase
We examine peer-reviewed studies from journals like the Journal of Financial Education and Educational Psychology Review. Each method must have at least three independent validation studies before consideration.
Pilot Implementation
Small cohort testing with 15-20 participants measures comprehension rates, completion times, and knowledge retention using standardized financial literacy assessments.
Outcome Measurement
Six-month follow-up assessments track skill application and knowledge decay. Methods must demonstrate 80% retention rates to earn permanent inclusion in our curriculum.
Dr. Ravenna Thorne
Research Director
- PhD Educational Psychology
- 15 years curriculum research
- Published 23 peer-reviewed papers
- Former MIT Teaching Fellow
Academic Research Foundation
Our methodology stems from Dr. Thorne's doctoral work on financial concept acquisition patterns. Her 2023 study, published in Applied Educational Research, demonstrated that structured progressive disclosure improved comprehension scores by 58% compared to traditional information presentation methods.
Every course module undergoes empirical testing before student release. We track cognitive load metrics, engagement patterns, and long-term retention using established educational measurement protocols.
Deliberate Practice Integration
Based on Anders Ericsson's expertise research, applied to financial modeling skill development
Interleaved Learning Design
Mixing problem types improves transfer ability by 76% according to our controlled studies
Metacognitive Training
Self-assessment techniques that increase problem-solving accuracy by 34%
Contextual Learning Framework
Real-world application scenarios reduce skill transfer gaps by 67%